Utopias, the descriptions of fictitious perfect societies, owe their name to Thomas More's Utopia (1516), a title of Greek origin that literally means nowhere. Before and after More's work there have been many other utopias, each one to the liking of its author, for the question of the perfect society gives a lot of play to the imagination. Examples include Plato's Republic, Tomasso Campanella's The City of the Sun (1602), Francis Bacon's New Atlantis (1627), Bulwer Lytton's The Coming Race (1871), Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward (1888, see this post), William Morris's News from Nowhere (1890), James Hilton's Lost Horizon (1933), or Aldous Huxley's Island (1962).
Manuel Alfonseca
Collection of my brief articles on popular science. Most have also been published in Spanish.
Full list at: https://manuelalfonseca.acta.es/docs/papersd.htm.
Showing posts with label George Orwell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Orwell. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 22, 2022
Thursday, March 29, 2018
About the social order
In a comment to the Spanish version of a
previous article in this blog, JI Gs wrote this:
All
societies have an explicit social order, whether they are fundamentally
believers or not in the immaterial; even animal societies, let alone insects,
have a strict social order and the immaterial has no need to act to generate it
or to maintain it.
I have two considerations to make:
![]() |
| Solitary bee (Megachile) and social bee (Apis) |
- Comparing human societies with insect societies is a false step. The human social order is based on a set of moral rules that has remained fairly constant over time, except in relation to sexual morality (see the appendix to The Abolition of Man by C.S. Lewis). The social order of insects is programmed in their genes and their nervous system. While in the human species it is possible, even frequent, that one or more members of society rebel against one or more rules, or even attempt to overthrow the entire social order, the members of insect societies cannot rebel. In other words, man is conscious and free, insects are not. Any comparison between them is out of place, because they are based on totally different structures.
Thursday, December 28, 2017
The best 40 science fiction novels I have read
![]() |
| Blade Runner poster |
Lists of favorite
books have always existed, and with the rise of the Internet they have
proliferated. That’s why I decided to make a new list (in case there were not
enough). But what I’m showing here is not just the list of my favorite books in
this genre, but something a little more complex.
To build the list, I
started with four lists made by others, sometimes individually, sometimes
collectively. For example, one of those lists has been created in Goodreads,
the social network for books, is called Best Science Fiction and
contains over 2,000 books. In order to build this list, the members of Goodreads
vote (almost 1000 people have voted for at least one book), together with the book’s
score and the number of people who have read it (in some cases several
million).
To form my new list I
used the following criteria:
- It just
contains books that I have read.
- It
does not contain books that I have read, but did not like at all (i.e. those
I would assign one star in the Goodreads or Amazon ratings). As an example
of these books I will mention Do androids dream with electric sheep? by
Philip K. Dick. Its argument is based on an interesting idea, but the way
it has been developed in the form of a novel is deplorable, sometimes
absurd. This is one of the rare cases where the film based on a book (Blade Runner)
turned out to be far superior to the original work.
- Therefore,
if one of your favorite books is not listed here, it may be for three
reasons: because I have not read it, because I did not like it at all, or
because it didn’t come among the top 40 in the average of the lists I have
used to build mine.
- It only contains science fiction books. The Lord of the Rings, for example, has not been included, although it is on one of these lists, because I don’t consider it science fiction.
Thursday, February 23, 2017
Toward Brave New World
![]() |
| Cover of Brave New World's 1st edition |
Just as a utopia is a literary work that
describes a perfect society, from the point of view of its author, a dystopia
is the description of a society where certain characteristics of the world in
which the author lives, which he considers unacceptable, are exaggerated and
carried to the extreme, with a satirical or denouncing intent.
The two world wars caused a feeling of
disillusionment in the West that gave rise to the two most famous dystopias of
recent history: Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
(written in 1931, published in 1932) and Nineteen-Eighty-Four
by George Orwell (written in 1948, published in 1949). These two works are
original in another sense: while other earlier dystopias (such as Samuel
Butler's Erewhon, 1872) were located in
remote places, such as the Antipodes, the two modern dystopias take place in
the future.
The feeling of oppression that seizes the
reader of these two novels is almost unbearable. In both cases, the very few
nonconformists in society are excluded: in the first, they
are banished to an island; in the second, the exclusion is only
temporary: the rebel is submitted to brainwashing
so as to destroy his spirit and turn him into a mental waste, raw material on
which the social planner can act, remodel and educate until he is recovered and
adapted to society. The two dystopias are horrible, but they have a very great
power of conviction and verisimilitude.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



