Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Utopias and Dystopias

Utopias, the descriptions of fictitious perfect societies, owe their name to Thomas More's Utopia (1516), a title of Greek origin that literally means nowhere. Before and after More's work there have been many other utopias, each one to the liking of its author, for the question of the perfect society gives a lot of play to the imagination. Examples include Plato's Republic, Tomasso Campanella's The City of the Sun (1602), Francis Bacon's New Atlantis (1627), Bulwer Lytton's The Coming Race (1871), Edward Bellamy's Looking Backward (1888, see this post), William Morris's News from Nowhere (1890), James Hilton's Lost Horizon (1933), or Aldous Huxley's Island (1962).

In contrast to utopias, dystopias describe imperfect societies that allow their author to criticize the society to which he belongs, or to predict future trends that are undesirable or frankly horrible. Dystopias are more modern than utopias: they date back to the latter part of the 19th century, have proliferated during the 20th century (especially after the global discouragement resulting from the First World War and the communist revolution in Russia), and continue to be published in the 21st century. The list that I am going to offer here is by no means exhaustive. The selection criterion is the fact that I have read them all.

  • Erewhon by Samuel Butler (1872): Its title comes from the English word “nowhere”, which means the same as Utopia, only Butler has spelled it backwards, which means that it is the opposite of a utopia (the word dystopia, which makes use of the Greek prefix dys = bad, did not yet exist). Butler places it in an unidentified British colony resembling New Zealand, and uses the novel to criticize the English society of his time.
  • Lord of the World  by Robert Hugh Benson (1907): Along with A Canticle for Leibowitz, the book I spoke about in the previous post, this is one of the best dystopias by Catholic writers.
  • We by Yevgueni Zamyatin (1921) criticizes a society vaguely similar to that of the Soviet Union, extrapolating it towards a suffocating future.
  • Brave New World by Aldous Huxley (1932): Influenced by the previous one, it extrapolates science, predicting important advances in the genetic manipulation of embryos and artificial gestation, the tools of a “benevolent” dictatorial government that uses eugenics to split society in several classes genetically and intellectually different, and which uses sex and drugs to keep the people subdued and easily manipulated. Nonconformists are permanently banished to an island. I talked about this dystopia in another post.
  • Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell (1948): Also influenced by We, it criticizes Soviet society and extrapolates it to a world domination that does not exclude war, whose leaders use lies and fear to control society, and brainwashing to reshape and reeducate nonconformists.
  • One (or Escape to Nowhere) by David Karp (1953): Chilling description of brainwashing and the destruction and reconstruction of a human being by an evil, amoral character, devoid of feelings. A good illustration of the abolition of man, with a slightly optimistic ending.
  • Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury (1953): A future society where political correctness has reached such an extreme that all books are banned because, in the words of one character, any book whatever will always offend some minority. Only comic strips are allowed to be read and readers of books are persecuted.
  • A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess (1962): In a future society, juvenile delinquency is out of control. One young criminal is successfully subjected to a mental manipulation and rehabilitation program, but the effects of the treatment disappear later and the protagonist reverts to a state of orgiastic violence, although in the end he matures and improves his behavior.
  • Do androids dream of electric sheep? by Philip K. Dick (1968): In a future society, intelligent androids (replicants) are almost indistinguishable from humans. The government keeps them segregated so that they won't mix with humans. To achieve this, a new profession appears: destroyers of replicants who try to pass themselves off as humans. As I said in another post, Blade Runner, the movie based on this novel, is much better than the novel.
  • I am Margaret by Corinna Turner (2014): In the future, the culture of death has spread in the European Union and Great Britain. Young people who fail an exam are segregated to use their organs for transplants. Catholics are persecuted, must go underground, and are executed through live quartering, just as the English did to punish treason in the days of the Tudors.

In a chapter of my book The Fifth Level of Evolution, I make a more complete analysis of utopias and dystopias, and at the end I say the following:

Dystopias are horrible, but they have a power of conviction, a probability, far superior to their opponents… Any society that wishes to perpetuate itself indefinitely at all costs must resort to inhuman and dehumanizing control methods. Any society, made of free, selfish men, inclined to evil, must be unstable by nature, unless its members are forced to adopt a permanently conformist attitude. This is what C.S. Lewis calls The abolition of man.

Which dystopia do I consider most likely? Of the two best known, Brave New World and Nineteen Eighty-Four, it is often said that we are getting closer, and in many ways this is true. But I prefer to remember what Jesus Christ said about this: The gates of hell shall not prevail against my Church (Mt. 16:18). Neither utopias nor dystopias will prevail, because man is free and can fall in sin and be redeemed.

The same post in Spanish

Thematic Thread about Literature and Cinema: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca

No comments:

Post a Comment