Jacques Monod |
When we don’t know why something happens, we usually say that it is due to chance. But this statement is ambiguous, because there are two different types of chance:
- Epistemological chance, where the cause of what’s happening is
well-known, but so complex that it remains outside the scope of our
knowledge. Almost all games of chance (dice, roulette, lottery jackpot)
are examples of this type of chance. Rolling dice conforms to the laws of
mechanics, but the conditions are so complex that we cannot predict the
result of each roll. This type of chance is what Jacques Monod called operational uncertainty in his book Chance and Necessity (1970):
This term is used... in relation to the game of dice, or roulette, and the calculation of probabilities is used to predict the result of a play. But these purely mechanical and macroscopic games are not "the result of chance" except because of the practical impossibility of controlling the throwing of the dice or the ball with sufficient precision. It is evident that a very high precision launching mechanism is conceivable, and would make it possible to largely eliminate the uncertainty of the result... The same thing happens, as will be easily seen, in... many phenomena where the notion of chance and the calculation of probabilities are applied for purely methodological reasons. (My translation into English).