The story of the hundredth monkey is a good example of how
pseudosciences arise and spread.
Colonies of Japanese macaques (Macaca
fuscata) have been studied for years by ethologists. During the 1950s and
1960s, a colony of macaques on the island of Kōjima was carefully studied by a
team of Japanese researchers. To make their research easier, the monkeys were
fed by the researchers with sweet potatoes and other products, which were left
for them on the island’s beach and other places. In 1953, a young monkey
discovered that sweet potatoes left on the beach and encrusted with sand were
tastier if they were washed in the sea before being eaten. The discovery spread
slowly among the macaques in the colony, especially the younger. The oldest,
however, did not learn this new behavior.
In 1965, the researcher Masao Kawai
published an
article recounting the results of 10 years of research with this population
of macaques and says the following:
The acquisition of [this] behavior can be divided into two
periods: before and after 1958... 1) The first period... of individual
propagation... [in which the monkeys that acquired the
new behavior did not learn it from their elders, but from individuals juveniles
that had learned it before.] 2) The second
period... of pre-cultural propagation [in which infant macaques
learned it from their parents, as usually occurs in many animals.]
In 1979, Lyall Watson published a book (Lifetide) where he described what had happened
on Kōjima as follows (the following is my summary and paraphrase of Watson’s
statements):
In 1958, in the monkey population on the island of Kōjima, an
unexpected phenomenon occurred. When a certain monkey (say the hundredth monkey)
learned the new behavior (washing sweet potatoes in the sea) that behavior
suddenly spread to the entire population. Not only that, but it also suddenly
spread to other neighboring islands where it had not been detected before. This
is so surprising that the Japanese team has not dared to publish all their
results.
Watson draws from this the conclusion that
the hundredth monkey phenomenon
shows that when a certain number of beings learn a new behavior, that behavior passes
spontaneously to the entire population, and even jumps outside its geographical
limits, becoming racial knowledge. It should be noted that Watson
is a supporter of extrasensory perception in man and uses this phenomenon
of the hundredth monkey as support for his ideas in that field.
The phenomenon of the hundredth monkey
spread like wildfire in environments related to the New Age, in
which Watson moves. This phenomenon was used to claim that human
beings could prevent a possible catastrophic nuclear war simply by increasing
the number of people opposed to it. By crossing a threshold, surely that
behavior would spread to the entire world population, and the danger would be
averted.
Apparently, none of those who eagerly
embraced the hundredth monkey theory and wanted to apply it to man bothered to
check Watson’s documentation (five articles published by the Japanese team). In
1985, Ron Amundsen decided to investigate the matter by reading the literature.
What he discovered was this (my paraphrase of his
article):
The assertion that the Japanese team did not dare to publish all
their discoveries is false. All the information is in the articles, especially
that by Kawai mentioned above. It is false that in 1958 the conduct of washing
sweet potatoes suddenly spread to the entire population. That year only two monkeys
learned it. It is obvious that Watson misunderstood Kawai's words mentioned
above, pointing out that 1958 marked a change in the mode of behavior
transmission, because the infant macaques of the previous years became adults
and began to teach it to their children. It is false that this behavior
suddenly spread to neighboring islands. It is true that it appeared in some of
them, but the cause could be its independent discovery, or the possible crossing
of one of the monkeys who knew it from one island to another.
How did Watson answer criticism?
He accepted that the hundredth monkey phenomenon was a figment of
his imagination, and tried to justify himself by saying that he did not
reference the Japanese articles as documentation, but as tools. As Amundsen
points out, perhaps being refuted by your own
tool is less painful than being refuted by your own documentation.
Finally, although Watson admits that his phenomenon did not take place in
Kōjima, he claims that it is true.
This is how many pseudosciences arise and spread:
everyone accepts what their creators say, without bothering to confirm it.
Perhaps soon we may see the emergence of new pseudosciences,
whose creator will be ChatGPT and its successors (such as GPT4).
The same post in Spanish
Thematic Thread about Science in General: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca
