Isaac Asimov |
These are, according to Isaac Asimov, the two golden rules of good science fiction:
1. Any scientific claim (even a
prediction) must always be compatible with current science. It would not, therefore, be good science fiction a novel where the
squaring of the circle with a ruler and compass was achieved, because it has
been shown mathematically that this is impossible. Or traveling through space
at a speed greater than that of light, without using some scientific trick that
makes it possible to achieve it, such as going through the world of
tachyons.
2. Predicting social consequences
is better than predicting technical advances. Thus, in a hypothetical novel written in the nineteenth century, predicting
the parking problem would be much better than just predicting the car. An
example of this kind of good science fiction, mentioned by Asimov in this
regard, is Robert Heinlein's short story Solution Unsatisfactory, written in 1941,
which not only predicted the atomic bomb as a means of ending World War II (in
which the United States were not yet taking part), but also predicted the
subsequent equilibrium between the great powers and the permanent threat of a
war of extermination.
To be exact, these two laws are my elaborations of what Asimov wrote in two popular articles published in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction: Future? Tense! (1965) and O Keen Eyed Peerer into the Future (1974). To be even more exact, Asimov's laws were three and, similarly to his three laws of Robotics, he called them the three laws of Futurics.