Manuel Calvo Hernando |
- At
the end of the 1980s, I became a member of the Spanish Association of
Scientific Journalism, which had been created in the early 1970s by the
famous Spanish science popularizer Manuel Calvo Hernando, whose articles
in a major newspaper I had been following since the 1960s. By then, I was writing
many science popularization articles, which were published by another
Spanish newspaper, La Vanguardia. Calvo Hernando was delighted to receive
me at the Association.
- Around
the year 2000, this association changed its name to the Spanish
Association for Scientific Communication (AECC in Spanish). These initials
happened to be the same as those of the Spanish Association Against
Cancer. Therefore, the acronym has recently been changed to AEC2.
- In
May 2008 I began to collaborate with the AECC blog, which was being
organized by the professor of journalism Juan Carlos Nieto. Since then,
until June 2019, I published 121 scientific popularization posts in this
blog (one post per month), several of which were, during a decade, among the
most visited posts in the blog.
- In
the discussions following their publication, some of my posts sparked the
longest, most passionate debates and the greatest number of comments in
the blog's history. As a result of one of those discussions, associated
with one
of my posts, which dealt with abortion, one of the members of the
board of directors tried to have me expelled from the Association. He did
not succeed, because the president at the time (Antonio Calvo Roy, the son
of the founder) did not agree, although an official message was sent to me,
enjoining me to put an end to that post’s discussion.
- In
April 2020, after thirty years of active participation, I decided to stop
being a member of the AEC2. Immediately, all the posts I had written for
that blog disappeared, along with every associated comment. No trace was left.
Fortunately, almost all had been published in my own blog, so it’s still
possible to find them. My website contains a
list of all the posts published in both blogs, and although the links
to my posts in the AEC2 blog are broken, I have decided to leave them
there, so that they provide a historical record of their publication.
Information on the Web
Wide Web is ephemeral. This is a well-known fact. Sometimes
documents are missing for compelling reasons, such as possible copyright
infringement. This has happened with several scientific articles, especially famous
ones, that various universities made public, but later had to withdraw, because
the magazines where these articles were originally published protested, as they
intend to go on selling electronic copies, many decades after their publication.
During the first years of this century,
Internet links appeared in many books, usually in footnotes. Later, as many of
those links stopped working after some time, it became fashionable to add the
following clarification:
Link
checked on xx/xx/20xx.
Meaning that the link is not guaranteed to
work after the specified date.
Because of this, it might be inadvisable to
put Internet links in books published in hard copy, or hypertext links in
electronic publications, for it’s likely that they won’t work forever.
Sometimes the specific document may be found in another address (as in the case
of my posts for the AEC2 blog), but it’s usually more convenient to use a good
search engine to locate it, if it is available.
Another figure frequently given is the global flow of data over the Internet, which has been growing hugely from the
beginning. Thus, the first paragraph of the document Economy
of data and artificial intelligence of the Spanish Ministry of Economic
Affairs and Digital Transformation, dated November 2020, says this:
The volume of data generated in the world in 2018 is estimated
at 33 zettabytes. The predicted estimation for 2025 is 175 zettabytes.
where one zettabyte is equal to 1021
bytes. But that is the total volume of data exchanged. Every transaction counts.
Each time someone visits a web page, the corresponding flow of data is counted.
However, most of these data are not stored by anyone, they are transmitted,
read and lost, they are ephemeral. I don't know if this value is useful, except
to estimate the total expenditure of energy on the Internet, which can also be
deduced in other ways. In the parallel case of the human nervous system, I have
never seen anyone bothering to estimate how many nerve discharges are produced
per unit of time. If this value were available, I can’t see how it could be useful.
A different question is how many data are
stored on the WWW. By 2021 there were 1.88 billion websites. From that value,
the total information could be deduced, by estimating statistically the average
in each website. A decade ago, the total amount had reached one exabyte (1018
bytes). Today it may be about one zettabyte (1021 bytes). On the
other hand, almost 90% of the websites may be inactive (the figures vary depending
on who gives them), so the actual total information available may not be that
great.
Thematic Thread about Natural and Artificial Intelligence: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca
No comments:
Post a Comment