Thursday, January 2, 2020

The theological multiverse

In other posts in this blog (see one of the thematic threads at the end of this post) I have talked about various theories of multiverses and asserted that none of them is scientific, as it is impossible to prove that they are false. In fact, I doubt if they can even be considered philosophical. I consider them imaginative fantasies: science fiction, rather than science.
The funny thing is that the idea of the multiverse is not new. I’ve mentioned before that its first appearance in science fiction was in a novel by Clifford Simak (Cosmic Engineers, 1950) that develops a short story published in 1939 by the same author.
But Simak’s novel also has precedents; quite old, by the way. Chapter 21, verse 1 of Revelation, a book written towards the end of the first century, says this:
And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth are passed away; and the sea is no more. 
A new heaven and a new earth. What is this talking about? Obviously about another universe, where we are supposed to go, after our death. It seems, therefore, that in the Christian vision of the cosmos, God has made at least two universes: ours, and another one for the next life. This would be the theological multiverse, a name I’ve just invented.
When physicists talk about other universes, they often give free rein to their imagination. I’ll do the same.
The second universe would have its own time, independent of ours. If we want them to be related somehow, I’d say that the two axes of time are orthogonal (perpendicular to each other). Christ (God incarnated as a man), in his death, leaves our time and passes through to the other time. On his way, he captures all the human beings that have ever existed or will exist, and drags them to the other universe. We all reach the other universe at the initial moment of its own time. We all arrive at the same time. No one must wait for anyone in the next life.
I will add two additional considerations:
  • Some atheist cosmologists cling to the various theories of the multiverse to safeguard their atheism. They seem to believe that, if the multiverse were proven to exist, this would show that God does not exist. I can’t see why. If God has created a universe, what can prevent him from creating two, one hundred or one hundred thousand? The discovery of a multiverse would do nothing but expand our field of vision, pointing out that there are more levels in the universe than are dreamt of in our philosophy, paraphrasing what Hamlet told Horatio. But this has happened before: Until the beginning of the 20th century, it was believed that the universe consisted just in the nearby stars. Later it was discovered that these stars make a galaxy, and that there are billions of galaxies, separated by huge empty spaces. This enormous increase in the size of the universe posed no problem for the faith of believers. If it were discovered that there is a multiverse (in other words: that the universe is even larger and more complex than we thought) it won’t be a problem either.
  • I’d never dare to present my theory, described in this article, as if it were science. As things stand just now, none of the theories of the multiverse is science. There are several, most of them incompatible with the others. If an unexpected scientific advance were ever to take place, proving that one of them were true, that theory would become science. Just now there are no signs that such thing can happen. As for my theory, I am afraid we won't know whether it is true until after our death.
Thematic Thread on Multiverse and Fine Tuning: Previous Next
Thematic Thread on Science and Religion: Previous Next

No comments:

Post a Comment