For decades we have been sold the idea that when we fully harness solar energy, all our problems of getting cheap and abundant energy, air pollution, and global warming will be solved.
For decades I have been warning that this
optimistic approach is not true. If we were able to completely replace
energy from fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) by solar energy, some of
our problems will not go away, they will just take longer to become
unsustainable, especially the problem of global warming.
Why do I think this? Because the Earth receives a certain amount of solar energy. A part is used by plants to carry out the chlorophyll function, which transforms inorganic matter into organic matter, thus making life possible for all animals, including us, humans. Another part heats the oceans and the continents, allowing the Earth to maintain an almost constant temperature, despite the heat losses it suffers every day from the side opposite the sun. Finally, another part of the solar energy is reflected or diverted, in the atmosphere or on the surface, and is lost in outer space.
Suppose we manage to harness solar energy
to meet all our energy needs. It is evident that we would get it at the cost of
reducing the amount of solar energy reflected or diverted, so that a greater
proportion of the solar energy reaching us every day would stay here, on Earth.
Therefore, the average temperature of the Earth would rise. A little more
slowly than if we get that same energy by burning fossil fuels, but in the long
run the situation would also become unsustainable.
Is there any study that shows that this
scenario can be true; that it is not just a speculation of a pessimistic? Well
yes, there is.
An
article published in the journal Physics World reports on a study by David
Sailor's team at Arizona State University. This study shows that cities where solar
panels have been placed on the roofs and terraces of many houses heat up
significantly during the day: their average temperature becomes higher than
normal. David Sailor explains it like this:
When you put [photovoltaic panels] on that white roof, the PV
panels typically absorb in the order of 90% of the energy of the Sun. And the
PV panels then do convert some of that energy to electricity, but typical
panels today are only maybe 16–20% efficient. These panels are absorbing a
tremendous amount of energy from the Sun, converting some of it into
electricity, but then warming up because they’re not able to use all of the
energy. So, these PV panels tend to be rather hot surfaces in the environment.
To mitigate the problem, Sailor proposes
that reflective panels be placed in close proximity to the solar panels, so
that the reflected solar energy increases. And he seems to think that if we
could increase the efficiency of the solar panels to get near 100% (which, of
course, is unattainable) the problem would disappear. But he does not realize
that, in such a case, if almost all the solar energy were to be converted into
electricity, that electricity would eventually, sooner or later, turn into
heat, so that the increase in temperature would still take place, although in a
more distributed way, depending on where the electricity is used. But global
warming would continue to increase.
This does not only affect solar energy. Another
older study concluded that if all our energy were got from wind, the world
would also warm up, not to mention the harmful effects that wind turbines have
on fauna, flora and soil erosion.
If we remember that all forms of energy
eventually end up being converted into heat, we will come to the conclusion
that the only way to avoid global warming in the long term is to reduce total
energy consumption. Using renewable sources does not change this situation,
although it would make it possible to stop the increase in carbon dioxide in
the atmosphere and some other harmful effects. These forms of energy are
cleaner than fossil fuels, but they cannot be completely clean, precisely
because they end up being converted into heat.
Thematic Thread on Politics and Economy: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca
No comments:
Post a Comment