We all know
the Human Genome project, officially launched
in 1990, although it had been working partially since 5 years earlier. Its
purpose was to identify and decipher all the genes in human DNA in 15 years.
The project was completed in 2003, within the foreseen term, although in the
year 2000 partial results were published. From the scientific point of view,
the project was a success, but perhaps for a part of the public it can look
like a failure, as the exaggerated expectations aroused by some media have not
been fulfilled.
The media
hailed the project as the door to a new medical
revolution. Among the revolutionary applications announced were:
gene therapy to prevent or correct genetic diseases;
premature diagnosis of actual or potential diseases, even from the embryonic
stage; or personalized medicine, which would adapt treatments of diseases to
the ailing person. Possible dangers were also discussed, such as
the manipulation of human embryos to adapt their genes to the wishes of parents
or dictatorial governments; or the use of genetic data to select personnel, or
to grant or deny insurance and credit...
Let us look
at a few headlines taken from the newspaper library of a major Spanish
newspaper (La Vanguardia):
- The search for the Biological
Grail (10/21/1989,
page 2 of the Science and Technology supplement).
- DNA as a medical instrument.
Scientists already have techniques to manipulate the privacy of the
individual
(12/21/1990, page 5 of the Medicine and Quality of Life supplement).
- The engine of modern economy.
Geneticists lay the foundation for a medical and economic revolution (6/27/2000, page 37).
- The human genetic code lays the
foundation for a medical revolution (12/31/2000, magazine, page 6).
Cost of sequencing a human genome |
After the
end of the project, when such forecasts were not fulfilled immediately, the
public felt some disappointment. The fact that research in this field would
slow down was predictable, for in the United States the Human Genome project
was financed entirely with new funds, without affecting other research budgets.
Once the special funds were finished, new projects in this field (such as the ENCODE project, aimed at
discovering all the functional elements of the genome, or the Human Microbiome
project, which analyzed the genomes of microbes living in symbiosis with
man) had to enter competition with investigations in different fields of
science. Naturally, decreasing the funds automatically decreased the speed of
the research. Anyway, in the next years there were significant advances. For
example, the cost of sequencing an individual human genome has been divided by 100,000
(it is currently less than $1,000 per person).
An article
published in Science News in 2014 stated that the
cost of storing a person’s genome is greater than sequencing it.
This statement must be wrong, because a complete human genome (the DNA in the
chromosomes) is made of about three billion nucleotides. Since each nucleotide can
belong to four different types, depending on its nitrogenous base (adenine,
guanine, cytosine or thymine), two bits are enough to define a nucleotide, thus
the complete description of the genome would take about 6 gigabits, an amount
of information that can be stored in a USB stick of one gigabyte, at a cost of a few
dollars.
The Human Genome project was a
triumph of science, but
its effects will not be immediate. This need not be bad. This way we will have
more time to prevent its possible harmful effects. As with any tool, the knowledge
about the genome can be used in a right or a wrong way. But the systematic
exaggeration in the predictions, motivated by the desire to get impacting headlines,
can lead to disappointment and cause public opinion to be against similar
projects in the future.The same post in Spanish
Thematic Thread on Popularization of Science: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca
These two articles indicate clearly that even the number of genes in the human genome is not agreed upon:
ReplyDeleteNew human gene tally reignites debate
A recount of human genes ups the number to at least 46,831