Oswald Spengler |
This year it will mark one century
since the publication in 1918 of the first volume of the book The Decline of the West, by Oswald Spengler.
The second volume was published five years later, in 1923. This book was the
first to raise the idea that our famed Western civilization is in decline. What
can we say about it, a hundred years later?
The great historian of the
twentieth century, Arnold J. Toynbee, agreed with Spengler on his fundamental
idea, although not in the details. For Toynbee, Western civilization collapsed in the
twentieth century, when the two world wars proved its inability to face
new challenges. Of course, for Toynbee, the collapse of a civilization does not
mean its disappearance, it does not even prelude it. We still have ahead -
according to him - a few centuries of what Toynbee calls the Universal
Empire, linked, however, to a certain cultural stagnation.
The first thing we have to notice
is: if Spengler actually managed to detect the decadence of our civilization, it
means that the decline
had begun much earlier. Evolutionary movements, both biological and
cultural, are imperceptible at the beginning. When they become visible, they
are quite advanced in their development.
Arnold J. Toynbee |
In another post in this blog (The
myth of the Enlightenment) I explained that in the first half of the eighteenth
century there was an important cultural decline throughout the West, a drop in the scientific,
literary and artistic productions, compared to the previous two centuries. I
also pointed out that one of the supposedly important figures of this era
(called by those who lived at that time with the pompous name of Enlightenment)
was the English philosopher David Hume, father of skepticism. His philosophical
theories, based on the rejection of the possibility to know truth, can be
considered responsible for the fast decadence experienced by philosophy since
the mid-nineteenth century, which has spread to science since the
mid-twentieth century.
The decline of the West has reached
today a very advanced state, much higher than in Spengler’s time. If by 1920 the
Western visual arts were dissolving into a conglomerate of isms, with a number of art schools
almost equal to that of practitioners, Western music can be considered
practically dead for the last half century. Even cinema, the most modern of
the arts, unique to our civilization, after a short golden age that spanned a
little over a quarter of a century, collapsed in 1965. From that date, the art of cinema
has lost originality and is based almost exclusively on remakes of previous hits,
galactic sagas and adaptations of modern or ancient literary works.
What about science? In previous
posts I have mentioned that it is quickly losing contact with reality.
Physics, the queen of experimental sciences, is in a clear decline. When this effect
reaches biology, the most rapidly advancing science during the 20th century, the scientific development of our civilization will have come to an end.
Quantitative data provide significant evidence that this trend is real,
that it is not just my pessimistic bias.
In a
recent book (whose Spanish title, translated into English, is Biological and cultural
evolution in the history of life and man) I have tried to detect the
cause of the decadence. I think there are reasons to assert that our decline is
parallel with the rise of atheism, which began with the Enlightenment, spread to philosophy in the nineteenth century, causing the death of this discipline
(this was pointed by Karl Marx said in his Manuscripts) and since the mid-twentieth
century has invaded our entire society.
Basic science, less contaminated
by this tendency, because it has nothing to say on religious matters, has
remained farthest from the decadence for longer, but the invasion by atheism
of the social environment threatens to put an end to its development. Only
applied science (technology) still maintains the inertia of its advances in
previous centuries.
In short: the decline of the West,
signaled by Spengler a century ago in a book that provoked a strong
controversy, is today indisputable. We just have a doubt about how long we’ll
be able to stand this situation.The same post in Spanish
Thematic Thread on Science and History: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca
No comments:
Post a Comment