Earth lighting in the winter solstice |
The time of
the winter solstice was the occasion for major celebrations by nearly all
ancient peoples. It represents the time when the sun, after losing height for
six months, begins again to recover its upward movement. The ancients had always
the fear that some year the sun could fail to recover, and would continue down until
disappearing forever, a catastrophe for humanity.
In the
Roman Empire, the Saturnalia played that role, for Saturn was the god of
agriculture and the recovery of the sun was a sine qua non for the success of the next harvest. Also, just by
that time the sun entered the sign of Capricorn in the zodiac, which was
astrologically linked with the planet Saturn. The festival, which began on
December 17, lasted for several days, until the 23rd. During these days,
banquets were held, gifts were distributed, and masters served their slaves.
One of the
traditional deities of ancient Indo-European peoples, Mitra, had a varied fate,
according to the particular people we are talking about. Thus, in Vedic India
he was one of the chief gods, along with Varuna and the other asuras, but came to play a secondary role, almost
demonic, when in Hindu India prevailed the devas,
another group of gods including Siva and Vishnu.
Mitra, also
spelled Mithra, played an important role in the early Persian religion. When
Zoroaster introduced a new religion, Mazdeism, and eliminated most of the old
gods, he (or his successors) decided to keep Mithra, who was ranked among the ahuras, a word clearly akin to the Vedic asura. The ahuras
were divine beings, or at least angelic. One of them was the supreme God, Ahura Mazda, who gives name to this religion.
In the
Indo-European religions of southern Europe, the Greek and the Roman mythologies,
the god Mitra had disappeared. Although the Parthian and the Persians were the traditional
enemies of the Roman Empire, the cult of Mitra was imported in Rome, where he
became the supreme God of a solar religion, Mithraism, whose cult spread
throughout the Roman army, but rather less in civil society. In one of my
novels (El sello de Eolo, The seal of Aeolus) the
conflict between Mithraism and Christianity under emperor Marcus Aurelius plays
a role.
To meet the
increasing spread of Christianity in the empire, in 274 the Roman emperor
Aurelian tried to encourage Mithraism. As this divinity had a solar character, he
instituted its most important festivity on December 25, which was near the
winter solstice, the day of the triumph of the sun. The feast was called Dies Natalis Solis Invicti, the birthday
of the unconquerable sun.
Isaac Newton |
For some
time it was assumed that, after the triumph of Christianity, the Catholic Church
tried to Christianize the pagan festivities by placing the Christian celebrations
on the same dates. According to this theory, the date of December 25 for
Christmas would have been chosen to compete with the day of the unconquerable
sun, or at least with the winter solstice festivities. Isaac Newton was one of the
proponents of this theory.
The Gospels
do not say anything about the date of the birth of Jesus. However, a very
ancient tradition, dating back to Irenaeus (second century A.D.) placed the
date of the Incarnation in the spring equinox (March 25 on the Roman calendar
of the time, the first day of the year in the traditional Republican calendar in
Rome), so that the birth would have occurred nine months later (by December
25).
A recent
theory, based on the existing literature, suggests that the celebration of
Christmas is older than previously thought. According to this theory, the date
of Christmas was not chosen to compete with Aurelian’s feast of the unconquerable
sun, but just the opposite: the emperor would have chosen that date to compete
with a much older Christian celebration.
What is the
truth? As this is a historical, not a scientific fact, it is not possible to
solve the problem using deduction or induction, we must resort
to abduction,
and we have seen in
another article that this method of reasoning provides less certainty than
the other two, although in some cases the accumulation of documents can become convincing.
In this case we do not have enough documents to reach a final conclusion.
Manuel Alfonseca
No comments:
Post a Comment