Science News, January 19, 2008 |
In a
previous post I mentioned some inklings that seem to indicate that
scientific development is decelerating. In this post I will focus on further
evidence: the fact that most of the new discoveries being made in many sciences are almost always conditional. Rather than findings of fact, usually
they just forecast possible findings that could be made in the future.
To show that
this surmise may be true, I will consider a particular issue of the magazine Science
News, one of the most prestigious among those engaged in high-level popular
science. Specifically, I have taken the issue of January 19, 2008, which
contains 18 news. Let us consider the titles or the first words, where I have
enhanced those terms that indicate that the results of the investigation were
provisional or tentative (unless you are really
interested, you don’t have to read them all, you can skip to the last three
paragraphs):
- A rheumatoid
arthritis drug can clear up psoriasis in most children, a new study finds.
The report might be enough to
cinch regulatory approval for the drug, etanercept, as the first systemic
medication for psoriasis in youngsters. In this case the prevision actually took
place, as the drug has been approved later as a treatment for
plaque psoriasis.
- Replacing a
heart's cells could ease
transplants. I
haven’t found more recent news about this.
- Can lab-made blob
explain ball lightning? Seven years later the problem is still unsolved.
- Changes in diet,
rising population may strain
China's water supply. According to the latest data, China is not importing lots
of food, as foreseen in the article.
- Some old stars may make new planets. I don’t think this assumption has been
confirmed.
- Bat DNA leads to
longer limbs in mouse embryos. This news does not include a conditional term, therefore it must
correspond to a true discovery.
- DNA suggests Columbus took syphilis to
Europe. Observe
the phrase: suggests, does not prove.
- X-raying a
galactic jet set.
This news has no conditional terms, so it must correspond to a genuine
discovery.
- Despite uncertain odds, many horse owners gamble
on stem cell therapy. This subtitle makes it obvious that this is not a discovery, but
something possible in the future.
- Courts may be too skeptical of research
done with juries in mind. This article speaks about mistrust of courts against scientific
witnesses. It has to do
with suspicions, rather than discoveries.
- Transport
emissions sizable, and rising... [The researchers] used current and historical data to estimate the amounts of carbon
dioxide... As the text indicates, this news is based on estimates, not
in facts.
- Night lights may foster cancer. Perhaps yes, perhaps not.
- Future memory
chips might harbor moving parts. Or not.
- The most detailed
look yet at the monarch butterfly's built-in clock suggests it's an ancient model. Suggests, does not prove.
- Shallow sleep can impair a person's glucose
metabolism... The finding might explain previous studies that linked poor sleep patterns
with type 2... diabetes. Again the conditional mars the news.
- Switchgrass may yield biofuel bounty. This news has been
contradicted later by hard economic reality.
- HIV variant might help vaccine search. Or not. In fact, we still don’t have a
vaccine against AIDS.
- Satellite images
of Antarctica between 1992 and 2006 indicate that the continent was losing
ice much faster at the end of that period than it was a decade before. This news does seem to correspond to a
real discovery.
Switchgrass may yield biofuel bounty |
In summary,
out of 18 news, 3 appear to be genuine discoveries and 15 include conditional
terms that lower their importance. Of these, only one has been confirmed in over
seven years since the announcement. Another one has been discredited. The other
13 are still in limbo, unconfirmed forecasts for the future.
I have not made
an exhaustive study of other issues of the magazine, to confirm what this small
sample suggests. But this study could
indicate that most current scientific findings are not such, but just future
prospects without much basis. We could also add those assertions based on
imperfectly validated simulations. Where is science going?
If others can make conditional statements, I suppose I can too...
Manuel
Alfonseca
No comments:
Post a Comment