In a post
published in this blog in December 2015, Julio A. Gonzalo and I analyzed
the data on the world population provided in 2012 by the UN, along with their future
forecasts until the year 2100. A few months ago, the UN has updated those data
and forecasts with the figures
available in 2019. As seven years have elapsed, it is possible to compare the
forecasts made in 2012 with the real situation just now.
Data/forecasts for
2019
|
2012 forecasts
|
2019 real data
|
||
Low birth rate
|
Medium birth rate
|
High birth rate
|
||
Birth rate
|
16
|
18
|
21
|
18,5
|
Death rate
|
8
|
8
|
8
|
7,5
|
World population (millions)
|
7487
|
7640
|
7793
|
7713
|
Life expectancy
|
71,03
|
72,28
|
When comparing data with forecasts, we must bear in mind that in these
seven years the UN has improved the accuracy of the measurements.
If in 2012 they approximated all figures to the nearest integer, they now dare
to add a decimal digit. If we take this into account, we’ll see that the real data closely approximate the forecasts based on a
medium decrease in birth rate. The forecasts of a faster decline
(low birth rate) have not been met, nor those of a slower decline (high birth
rate), whose figures were clearly higher than the current ones. On the other
hand, world life expectancy has grown a year longer than expected,
which explains that the mortality rate is a little lower, and that the world
population has grown to about 7700 million, rather than 7640.
If we look now at future forecasts, we’ll see that things have not
changed much, although they are slightly different.
Forecasts for
|
2050
|
|||||
Scenario
|
Low BR
|
Medium BR
|
High BR
|
|||
Forecasted in
|
2012
|
2019
|
2012
|
2019
|
2012
|
2019
|
Birth Rate
|
11
|
11,6
|
15
|
14,6
|
18
|
17,5
|
Death Rate
|
11
|
10,1
|
10
|
9,4
|
9
|
8,7
|
World population
|
8342
|
8907
|
9551
|
9735
|
10868
|
10588
|
2012
|
2019
|
|||||
Life expectancy
|
75,9
|
76,77
|
Forecasts for
|
2100
|
|||||
Scenario
|
Low BR
|
Medium BR
|
High BR
|
|||
Forecasted in
|
2012
|
2019
|
2012
|
2019
|
2012
|
2019
|
Birth Rate
|
8
|
7,7
|
12
|
11,6
|
16
|
15,5
|
Death Rate
|
15
|
16,2
|
11
|
11,2
|
8
|
7,9
|
World population
|
6750
|
7322
|
10854
|
10875
|
16641
|
16000
|
2012
|
2019
|
|||||
Life expectancy
|
81,79
|
81,70
|
Figure 1 |
It will be noted that long-term forecasts (for 2100) have barely
changed compared to those made in 2012. Those of 2050 have undergone touch-ups,
the most important of which is the forecast that, with the low scenario birth
rate, the world population will reach its maximum
by 2055, when in 2012 that maximum was expected by 2050. A delay
of 5 years has been introduced in that forecast.
Figure 1 shows the historical and expected evolution for the birth rate
(red curve) and death rate (green curve) for the low birth scenario. The point where
both curves intersect corresponds to the moment when the world population would
reach its maximum. From that point on, the mortality rate would exceed the
birth rate and the world population would begin to decrease.
Figure 2 |
Figure 2 shows the same curves for the medium birth scenario. Note that
in this case the world population maximum would be reached in the first years
of the XXII century.
Figure 3 |
Figure 3 presents the past and expected evolution of the birth rate in
the three scenarios considered by the UN. It is easy to see that the high
birth rate scenario is unrealistic, as it assumes that from now on the
birth rate will grow again (after a continued decline since 1950) and will
remain almost constant in its current value for the rest of the century. The
medium birth rate scenario seems the most plausible, assuming that the
trend of the last 20 years will continue in the future. The low birth
rate scenario is also not unlikely, since it is based on a possible
repetition of the steep decline that took place between 1990 and 2000.
Of course, all these forecasts assume that in the next 80 years there won’t
be catastrophic events, such as nuclear wars, terrible pandemics and other
unpredictable natural phenomena that would reduce significantly the world
population.
In any case, the
updated UN data don’t change the situation significantly. The conclusions of
the post in this blog cited above, as well as those in this
other post about life expectancy, remain the same.The same post in Spanish
Thematic Thread on Futurology: Previous Next
Manuel Alfonseca
No comments:
Post a Comment