tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428850841046457972.post7191765039883545722..comments2024-03-23T02:29:26.258-07:00Comments on Popular Science: The Dawkins DelusionManuel Alfonsecahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12774826547519124306noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428850841046457972.post-32786203805088825812016-01-13T00:07:13.231-08:002016-01-13T00:07:13.231-08:00Right. Although Dawkins does not conclude that God...Right. Although Dawkins does not conclude that God doesn't exists, he just says that He is not probable. The problem is, his argument is logically flawed anyway.Manuel Alfonsecahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12774826547519124306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428850841046457972.post-38168781796594167822016-01-12T23:05:26.596-08:002016-01-12T23:05:26.596-08:00I once heard the phrase, "Absence of evidence...I once heard the phrase, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." That can really apply to Dawkins's "ultimate 747." Just because we cannot conceive of one above the universe does not simply mean that it doesn't exist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3428850841046457972.post-73008733771802711162014-10-16T01:03:15.077-07:002014-10-16T01:03:15.077-07:00I think it should be compulsory to include some ba...I think it should be compulsory to include some basics in philosophic logic in every university degree, or maybe in a previous course to access university.Pablo Gómez Abajohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08870863457570665767noreply@blogger.com